[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Kernel

To: linuxkb-list@seul.org
Subject: Re: Kernel
From: Jason Pincin <jpincin@ashtech.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 09:32:42 -0500
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9812301829300.17957-100000@shell5.ba.best.com>; from Aaron D. Turner on Wed, Dec 30, 1998 at 06:43:37PM -0800
References: <19981230210142.C7348@ashtech.net> <Pine.BSF.4.05.9812301829300.17957-100000@shell5.ba.best.com>
Reply-To: linuxkb-list@seul.org
Sender: owner-linuxkb-list@seul.org

> First, I won't touch 2.2.0 with a 10' pole.  Lots of reports of problems
> on the linux-kernel list with 2.2.0pre1.  Give it a few revisions; 2.0.x
> is going to continued to be updated for at least a year.

I understand.  I wouldn't run 2.2.0 on a production server until 2.2.8-or10ish

> for a list of patches.  Most of the stuff are tweaks to the kernel to make
> the system more stable or add features (auto-detect RAM > 64MB, etc).

Ah.  Cool.

Jason

References:
- Re: VA Pics
  - From: Jason Pincin <jpincin@ashtech.net>
- Kernel
  - From: "Aaron D. Turner" <aturner@best.com>

Prev by Date: Re: VA Pics
Next by Date: Re: VA Pics
Prev by thread: Kernel
Next by thread: Re: VA Pics
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread