[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GtkPlot vs. Guppi

To: drgenius-dev@seul.org
Subject: Re: GtkPlot vs. Guppi
From: George <jirka@5z.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 11:55:02 -0800
Delivery-Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 14:56:34 -0500
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.05.10001240741520.3854-100000@vitelus.com>; from aaronl@vitelus.com on Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 07:47:54AM +0000
References: <20000121225525.E3521@julia.linux.bogus> <Pine.LNX.4.05.10001240741520.3854-100000@vitelus.com>
Reply-To: drgenius-dev@seul.org
Sender: owner-drgenius-dev@seul.org

On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 07:47:54AM +0000, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
> I heard that you're planning on using guppi as a bonobo component, and I
> wanted to know if you want me to scrap the work i've done on making it
> work with GtkPlot and start playing with guppi.

Using guppi was one original idea.  But guppi has seemed to change a lot so I
don't know it's current state.  I think you're now sort of "in charge" of the
graphing side of dr.genius so ... :)

George

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GtkPlot vs. Guppi
  - From: aaronl@seul.org

References:
- Re: [patch] compile error fixes
  - From: George <jirka@5z.com>
- GtkPlot vs. Guppi
  - From: Aaron Lehmann <aaronl@vitelus.com>

Prev by Date: [arma@mit.edu: Re: [seul-edu] Dr Genius release]
Next by Date: Re: GtkPlot vs. Guppi
Prev by thread: GtkPlot vs. Guppi
Next by thread: Re: GtkPlot vs. Guppi
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread