gEDA-user: Calculating a linear self excited induction generator
John Doty
jpd at wispertel.net
Sun Jun 11 20:20:22 EDT 2006
On Jun 11, 2006, at 3:40 PM, Samuel A. Falvo II wrote:
> On 6/11/06, Karel Kulhavy <clock at twibright.com> wrote:
>> I read about self excited induction generator, homopolar generators,
>> liquid metal dynamos, interstellar plasma dynamos, linear motors
>> and electric meters.
>
> Ummm . . . Interstellar?!
Sure. That's where the galactic magnetic field comes from. Natural
dynamos are common in the universe: there's lots of conductive stuff
in electrical contact and in differential rotation.
About 3 years ago I heard a talk by Roger Blandford on the
electromagnetic physics of stellar collapse forming a black hole. The
dynamo saturation condition for the accretion disk a few seconds
after the initial collapse suggests there should be zetavolt
potentials driving exaamp currents around! Roger tweaked his
physicist audience by using SI units rather than the Gaussian units
physicists usually use: after all, he was analyzing the star as
electrical machinery. The only trouble is that the SI doesn't define
prefixes high enough to handle the power (something like 10^42
watts)! That power can make a gamma ray burst that's still intense
enough to be detected by an instrument you can hold in your hand
after traveling 10 billion years!
I expect to use gEDA to design the electronics for a new generation
gamma ray burst detector starting later this year.
>
>> I got an idea of placing two coils almost touching the aluminium
>> rim and
>> wiring them somehow obscurely with capacitors (how people do in wind
>> power plants with squirrel cage motors nobly relabeled as "self
>> excited
>> induction generators") so they would prime themselves and start
>> generating. If it works with cyclic asynchronous motor it should work
>> with a linear one too, shouldn't?
>
> In what way is it self-priming? Given a large enough, flat plate
> dynamo, I'm sure one could exploit the Earth's natural magnetic field.
> But, a small dynamo the size of which is suitable for a bike would
> never have sufficient surface area for electrical generation, no
> matter how fast it's made to spin.
>
> Remember that energy is neither created nor destroyed -- if it's
> self-generating, it has to draw energy from somewhere. Traditional
> alternators draw this energy from shaft rotation. Where is the
> self-excited generator drawing its energy from?
Dynamos convert mechanical energy into electromagnetic energy. In a
dynamo, there is positive magnetic feedback, so any tiny seed field
will build up until it reaches a saturation level determined by the
structure and operating conditions of the dynamo. The seed field
magnitude doesn't matter. But dynamo design is tricky: you really
have to understand and use Maxwell's equations. The network theory we
use for circuit design won't get you there.
John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
jpd at wispertel.net
More information about the geda-user
mailing list