gEDA-user: fun/easy BGA part
Andy Peters
devel at latke.net
Fri Dec 15 16:25:48 EST 2006
On Dec 15, 2006, at 12:45 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
> Ok, a s.e.design thread has got me thinking about pan-frying BGAs.
> Now I'm curious. What's a good BGA to start with? "Good" is defined
> as:
>
> 1. Inexpensive, cause I'll probably toast a few.
>
> 2. Useful, because it's good to see results.
>
> 3. Easy to design around, because I want to worry about the soldering
> process, and not burn through a number of chips getting the design
>
> 4. Require a minimum of support components.
>
> 5. Not so complex that lots of tiny vias would be needed. If I can
> get by with two rows pulled out on the top with 7/7 rules, and the
> remaining rows tied to gnd/vcc through one or two big vias, that's
> acceptable.
>
> Hmmm... BGA challenge anyone? ;-)
There are various small analog parts that are BGA.
We use a lot of FT256 BGAs here at the day job (Spartan2E FPGAs). We
can hand-attach them. We have a rework kit that includes a paste
mask for that package, so you line up the mask, squirt some paste,
then place the chip. To solder, we put the board in the board-holder
jig for a hot-air rework tool. We put a heater block directly under
the FPGA location, and then flow low-velocity hot air around the chip
(using a FQP nozzle). You watch the balls using a stereoscope, and
you can see when they get soft and melt. The chip self-aligns on the
pads. Works well, but does take some practice.
-a
More information about the geda-user
mailing list