gEDA-dev: Broken slotting
John Doty
jpd at wispertel.net
Wed Sep 12 05:43:52 EDT 2007
On Sep 11, 2007, at 10:52 PM, Ales Hvezda wrote:
>
> Random question, obviously this slipped by me, but there is code
> that is
> changing the pinseq= number on the fly? That doesn't seem right to
> me.
> I always assumed pinseq= would stay constant.
This was Stuart's attempt to make slotted components netlistable for
Spice. Have a three terminal four slot component with pinseq from 1
to 3 behave as if it had pinseq from 1 to 12. I personally think that
this is confusing and not especially useful. For consistency, need a
spice-slotdef attribute, and maybe a spice-pinnumber attribute would
be better for unslotted components, too. The way the Spice back ends
use pinseq has been a frequent source of confusion, even without this
slotting trick.
John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd at noqsi.com
More information about the geda-dev
mailing list