gEDA-dev: Broken slotting
Peter Clifton
pcjc2 at cam.ac.uk
Tue Sep 11 11:20:34 EDT 2007
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 09:56 -0400, John Doty wrote:
> On Sep 11, 2007, at 8:07 AM, Peter Clifton wrote:
>
> > I should be able to write a fix over the next day or so.
> >
> > Thanks for confirming the desired behaviour. I was (and still am) a
> > little concerned about not having any "contractual" guarantee that
> > every
> > symbol will have pinseq attributes start at "1" and end at the
> > number of
> > pins on the device. Perhaps this is implied though, by the nature
> > of the
> > slotdef attribute.
>
> Can we think this out a little better? Pinseq is a confusing
> attribute, made more confusing by its overloading:
This was kind-of where I was going with the "is it the right solution"
question. Clearly we want to fix the bug, but I guess this is something
we should think about long-term.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
More information about the geda-dev
mailing list