gEDA-dev: [RFC] Embedding/archiving compromise
John Griessen
john at ecosensory.com
Sat Oct 20 11:33:01 EDT 2007
Peter TB Brett wrote:
> - Implement the new embedding system (separate symbol definition and
> instantiation, and checks that the embedded symbol matches the library
> symbol). I don't think anyone has disputed that this is a good idea.
>
> - However, don't embed by default (but add an option which turns it on, and
> make an obvious GUI for embedding/unembedding symbols).
>
> Does this meet the sanity check?
Not really. It doesn't fit with future possibilities to put everything in a gnetman database
along chip design lines, where nothing should be embedded, only referenced so as to handle huge
designs. Embedding is unnecessary to achieve project-in-a-file goal.
John G
--
Ecosensory Austin TX
tinyOS devel on: ubuntu Linux; tinyOS v2.0.2; telosb ecosens1
More information about the geda-dev
mailing list