gEDA-dev: [RFC] Embedding/archiving compromise

John Griessen john at ecosensory.com
Sat Oct 20 11:33:01 EDT 2007


Peter TB Brett wrote:

> - Implement the new embedding system (separate symbol definition and 
> instantiation, and checks that the embedded symbol matches the library 
> symbol).  I don't think anyone has disputed that this is a good idea.
> 
> - However, don't embed by default (but add an option which turns it on, and 
> make an obvious GUI for embedding/unembedding symbols).
> 
> Does this meet the sanity check?


Not really.  It doesn't fit with future possibilities to put everything in a gnetman database
along chip design lines, where nothing should be embedded, only referenced so as to handle huge
designs.   Embedding is unnecessary to achieve project-in-a-file goal.

John G
-- 
Ecosensory   Austin TX
tinyOS devel on:  ubuntu Linux;   tinyOS v2.0.2;   telosb ecosens1


More information about the geda-dev mailing list