gEDA-dev: Peripheral SoC Project ideas
Peter Clifton
pcjc2 at cam.ac.uk
Mon Mar 12 14:55:59 EDT 2007
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 12:01 -0600, Marc Moreau wrote:
> I think those fall under 'not-code'. SoC rules say that the project must be code. THey explicitly preclude documentation. I think symbol verification and fixing falls closer to documentaion then it does to code.
>
> We could give it a try, but I don't think it is viable.
>
> -Marc
Fair enough.. I've not fully read all their terms and conditions. I did
wounder if those would be excluded.
It would be good to see work done on code for a parts managers though,
which might require some tidying up as part of assembling + testing the
database for our existing parts.
Peter C.
More information about the geda-dev
mailing list