gEDA-dev: Peripheral SoC Project ideas

Peter Clifton pcjc2 at cam.ac.uk
Mon Mar 12 14:55:59 EDT 2007


On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 12:01 -0600, Marc Moreau wrote:
> I think those fall under 'not-code'.  SoC rules say that the project must be code.  THey explicitly preclude documentation.  I think symbol verification and fixing falls closer to documentaion then it does to code.
> 
> We could give it a try, but I don't think it is viable.
> 
> -Marc

Fair enough.. I've not fully read all their terms and conditions. I did
wounder if those would be excluded.

It would be good to see work done on code for a parts managers though,
which might require some tidying up as part of assembling + testing the
database for our existing parts.

Peter C.




More information about the geda-dev mailing list