gEDA-dev: libgeda library version & stable branch

[Steve Meier]

I would like a development branch that is willing to do more then take
"baby steps" my vote is yes.

Steve Meier

Peter TB Brett wrote:
> On Thursday 31 May 2007 07:54:20 Peter TB Brett wrote:
>
>   
>> I think we should consider forking off a 1.0.x stable branch at this point,
>> which would be bugfix-only, and would use .so version 29.x and Guile 1.6.
>> Releases would occur when either a serious crash bug is fixed, or
>> sufficient fixes accumulate to appear worthwhile.
>>
>> Unstable development would take place in CVS HEAD as the 1.1.x version,
>> using .so version 30.x and Guile 1.8, with much more frequent releases so
>> that people can destruction test the cutting edge features.  I would
>> suggest monthly releases, no matter what state the tree is in, without too
>> much in the way of diligence w.r.t. release notes etc.
>>
>>     
>
> I'd appreciate some sort of feedback on this, even if said feedback is, "That 
> is the stupidest idea I've heard since I started hacking on gEDA.  Go clean 
> your mouth out with soap."
>
> Also, I have a whole bunch of patches here for removing Guile functions 
> deprecated in 2.8.x, so I need some sort of decisions to happen soon, please.
>
> Peter
>
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geda-dev mailing list
> geda-dev at moria.seul.org
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
>