gEDA-dev: libgeda library version & stable branch
Peter TB Brett
peter at peter-b.co.uk
Sat Jun 2 03:34:36 EDT 2007
On Thursday 31 May 2007 07:54:20 Peter TB Brett wrote:
> I think we should consider forking off a 1.0.x stable branch at this point,
> which would be bugfix-only, and would use .so version 29.x and Guile 1.6.
> Releases would occur when either a serious crash bug is fixed, or
> sufficient fixes accumulate to appear worthwhile.
>
> Unstable development would take place in CVS HEAD as the 1.1.x version,
> using .so version 30.x and Guile 1.8, with much more frequent releases so
> that people can destruction test the cutting edge features. I would
> suggest monthly releases, no matter what state the tree is in, without too
> much in the way of diligence w.r.t. release notes etc.
>
I'd appreciate some sort of feedback on this, even if said feedback is, "That
is the stupidest idea I've heard since I started hacking on gEDA. Go clean
your mouth out with soap."
Also, I have a whole bunch of patches here for removing Guile functions
deprecated in 2.8.x, so I need some sort of decisions to happen soon, please.
Peter
--
Fisher Society http://tinyurl.com/o39w2
CU Small-Bore Club http://tinyurl.com/mwrc9
09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0 peter-b.co.uk
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.seul.org/pipermail/geda-dev/attachments/20070602/3b95e78f/attachment.pgp
More information about the geda-dev
mailing list