gEDA-dev: g_hash_table_remove_all

Peter TB Brett peter at peter-b.co.uk
Thu Jul 5 13:12:01 EDT 2007


On Thursday 05 July 2007 09:12:40 Timmerman, Bert wrote:
> Hi Peter and all,
>
> FWIW, maybe a table of dependancies with allowed versions could be made
> and stated on one of the geda wiki developer pages.
>
> If this table is to exist, it may or may not reduce this kind of
> oversights in the future, it would at least give a clear picture on what
> to use.
>
> It has it's drawbacks: if, for instance, gtk is allowed to be <=1.6 in
> the future the table needs to be maintained (by whoever pushes the
> dependency version upwards).

If you mean a table of all permitted dependency symbols, then that's a really 
bad idea because it would be (a) huge and (b) totally impossible to maintain.

If you mean a list of dependencies and versions we seek to support, then there 
is one which is version-controlled and automatically synchronised to the 
state of the source tree: the configure.ac files.  These are, contrary to 
popular belief, human readable.

                         Peter

-- 
Peter Brett

Electronic Systems Engineer
Integral Informatics Ltd
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://www.seul.org/pipermail/geda-dev/attachments/20070705/3c8a1858/attachment.pgp 


More information about the geda-dev mailing list