gEDA-dev: Transformations during copying or moving operations

Peter TB Brett peter at peter-b.co.uk
Sun Jul 1 10:24:27 EDT 2007


On Sunday 01 July 2007 10:48:26 Patrick Bernaud wrote:
> Peter TB Brett writes:
>  > On Sunday 01 July 2007 09:35:53 Patrick Bernaud wrote:
>  > > Peter TB Brett writes:
>  > >  > [...]
>  > >  > of messy.  Patrick Bernaud had a really good idea which he
>  > >  > submitted a sort-of-broken patch to implement: use an 2x2 matrix to
>  > >  > represent
>  > >
>  > >    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>  > >
>  > > I am curious about what you mean by 'sort-of-broken'.
>  >
>  > Didn't apply cleanly.  Apart from that, it was great!
>
> Interesting. I never heard any complains of this type before. Even
> though, if I remember correctly, I ported it to CVS HEAD to ease
> review and testing.

Well, there were ChangeLog conflicts (but there always are).  I meant it 
didn't apply cleanly _now_, in that changes since the original patch base 
have made it out of date.

It mostly seems to be Peter C's noscreen work which conflicts.

Peter


-- 
Peter Brett

Electronic Systems Engineer
Integral Informatics Ltd
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://www.seul.org/pipermail/geda-dev/attachments/20070701/13392882/attachment.pgp 


More information about the geda-dev mailing list