gEDA-dev: Pinning down libgeda

[Peter TB Brett]

On Saturday 24 February 2007 04:45:31 Ales Hvezda wrote:

> There is no such thing as libgeda1, or libgeda2 (other than the debian
> package names) from my perspective.  The version of libgeda has always
> just been an increasing integer.  This is just a silly nit.

Okay, sorry.

> I'm certainly okay with changing libgeda or gschem a lot to improve
> the tools, but it does sound like a lot of work and I would hate to end
> up with something that is partially finished or unstable.  This is all
> in context that gEDA/gaf works now.  Maybe there should be a definite
> release of the existing architecture (say gEDA/gaf v1.0) and then the
> architecture of gEDA/gaf can be redesigned.

That does seem like a good idea.  I imagine that the definite release would go 
into a maintenance cycle as the stable version while the internals get 
butchered during the redesign?

Also, my arguments against gobject are looking sillier by the minute, as I 
realize that gobject was **designed** to make language bindings easy to 
write... d'oh!

Peter

-- 
Fisher Society committee                    http://tinyurl.com/o39w2
CUSBC novices, match and league secretary   http://tinyurl.com/mwrc9
CU Spaceflight                              http://tinyurl.com/ognu2

v3sw6YChw7$ln3pr6$ck3ma8u7+Lw3+2m0l7Ci6e4+8t4Gb8en6g6Pa2Xs5Mr4p4
  hackerkey.com                                  peter-b.co.uk
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.seul.org/pipermail/geda-dev/attachments/20070224/bf11d646/attachment.pgp