gEDA-dev: geda naming convention

[Stuart Brorson]

>>> If noone else has the time, I could volunteer. Altough I'm not a geda/pcb
>>> developer, I have some experience with using the tools.
>>
>> Go for it!  If it looks good, and there aren't too many objections, I
>> can try to figure out git and check it in.   (Or one of the Peters
>> might....)
>>
> OK; should it be /bin/sh or can it be /bin/bash (ksh compatible)? sh means
> it will run everywhere, bash means more structured source (with
> functions). Of course structured code will start to matter only when more
> advanced features would be added.

I'd prefer Dan McMahill to answer this question since he's the master of
non-Linux unix systems, and could tell you if bash exists on BSD,
Solaris, etc.

Also, it would be nice to hear from one of our friends who runs on the
most user-friendly unix of all, Mac OSX.

Dan?  Anybody who runs on Mac?

Cheers,

Stuart