gEDA-dev: geda naming convention

[Igor2]

On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Stuart Brorson wrote:

>> If noone else has the time, I could volunteer. Altough I'm not a geda/pcb
>> developer, I have some experience with using the tools.
>
>Go for it!  If it looks good, and there aren't too many objections, I
>can try to figure out git and check it in.   (Or one of the Peters
>might....)
>

OK; should it be /bin/sh or can it be /bin/bash (ksh compatible)? sh means
it will run everywhere, bash means more structured source (with
functions). Of course structured code will start to matter only when more
advanced features would be added.