gEDA-dev: DBUS binding to PCB actions

[Stuart Brorson]

On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, Peter Clifton wrote:
> Just looking at the behaviour of the "realpath" function, I see there is
> no standard amongst these operating systems. Clearly I need to write my
> own equivalent, or copy one with a compatible licence.
>
> What do people think about copying the glibc implementation, renaming it
> to avoid namespace clashes, and using that?

That sounds like exactly what I would do.  It's also completely
consistent with one of the important missions of copylefted software:
Facilitate design reuse.

Cheers,

Stuart