gEDA-dev: [PATCH 1/4] Make the interface of o_selection_add match the other o_selection_*()

[Peter TB Brett]

On Monday 18 December 2006 22:33, Carlos Nieves Ónega wrote:

> Agree. I wonder if just mark those functions as deprecated, or go ahead
> and remove it from the headers. If no other application is using them, why
> not make now remove it at once? what people think?

There are other uses of the functions within libgeda (although I'm not sure 
there should be).  Is there a 'private' libgeda header that they could go in?

Peter

-- 
Fisher Society committee                    http://tinyurl.com/o39w2
CUSBC novices, match and league secretary   http://tinyurl.com/mwrc9
CU Spaceflight                              http://tinyurl.com/ognu2

v3sw6YChw7$ln3pr6$ck3ma8u7+Lw3+2m0l7Ci6e4+8t4Gb8en6g6Pa2Xs5Mr4p4
  hackerkey.com                                  peter-b.co.uk
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.seul.org/pipermail/geda-dev/attachments/20061219/1595cae2/attachment.pgp