gEDA-dev: Re: [Gnucap-devel] Gnucap docs build failure on FC5 (and other places)

Dan McMahill dan at mcmahill.net
Mon Aug 7 18:36:49 EDT 2006


Stephen Williams wrote:
> al davis wrote:
> 
> 
>>There is a real need for a high quality replacement for 
>>autoconf.  
> 
> 
> I've had the name "CMake" wispered in my ear once or twice, and
> I've been considering looking into it. Apparently, some groups
> find it to be superior to autoconf, but I have no idea what I
> think of it, since I haven't look at it yet.

ack.  I'll believe its better when I see it actually working on lots of 
platforms.  Not saying it isn't but it surely is not as widely deployed 
as autoconf/automake.

-Dan


More information about the geda-dev mailing list