gEDA-dev: Re: [Gnucap-devel] Gnucap docs build failure on FC5
(and other places)
Dan McMahill
dan at mcmahill.net
Mon Aug 7 18:36:49 EDT 2006
Stephen Williams wrote:
> al davis wrote:
>
>
>>There is a real need for a high quality replacement for
>>autoconf.
>
>
> I've had the name "CMake" wispered in my ear once or twice, and
> I've been considering looking into it. Apparently, some groups
> find it to be superior to autoconf, but I have no idea what I
> think of it, since I haven't look at it yet.
ack. I'll believe its better when I see it actually working on lots of
platforms. Not saying it isn't but it surely is not as widely deployed
as autoconf/automake.
-Dan
More information about the geda-dev
mailing list