[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-dev: pcb: ARC_LOOP vs ELEMENTARC_LOOP

To: geda-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: gEDA-dev: pcb: ARC_LOOP vs ELEMENTARC_LOOP
From: DJ Delorie <dj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 12:44:48 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: geda-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sat, 07 Jun 2008 12:45:05 -0400
In-reply-to: <1212826475.26441.27.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (message from Bert Timmerman on Sat, 07 Jun 2008 10:14:34 +0200)
List-archive: <http://www.seul.org/pipermail/geda-dev>
List-help: <mailto:geda-dev-request@moria.seul.org?subject=help>
List-id: gEDA developer mailing list <geda-dev.moria.seul.org>
List-post: <mailto:geda-dev@moria.seul.org>
List-subscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev>, <mailto:geda-dev-request@moria.seul.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev>, <mailto:geda-dev-request@moria.seul.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1212820386.26441.21.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1212826475.26441.27.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: gEDA developer mailing list <geda-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: geda-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I wonder if ARC_LOOP was intended to be used for both elements and
layers?  We could #define to be the other.


_______________________________________________
geda-dev mailing list
geda-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev

References:
- gEDA-dev: pcb: ARC_LOOP vs ELEMENTARC_LOOP
  - From: Bert Timmerman
- Re: gEDA-dev: pcb: ARC_LOOP vs ELEMENTARC_LOOP
  - From: Bert Timmerman

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-dev: Meaning of the PCB Groups statement?
Next by Author: gEDA-dev: 2008 geda cookouts/sprints
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-dev: pcb: ARC_LOOP vs ELEMENTARC_LOOP
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-dev: pcb: ARC_LOOP vs ELEMENTARC_LOOP
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread