Re: gEDA-dev: netlist route styles

[John Doty <jpd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Jun 3, 2008, at 10:11 AM, der Mouse wrote:

>>> Console based processing would have to work as usual, perhaps
>>> throwing a stderr / stdout warning that there might be out-dated
>>> footprints for certain files.
>> Unacceptable.  In a large project, such warnings are lost in the
>> spew.
>
> Then surely the right thing to do is clean up the spew!

Yeah, except nobody ever really achieves that with make.

>   Even if it
> means a grep -v to throws out the commands reported by make...or using
> @ on the commands you don't want to see, if you can hack the Makefile.
>
>> Some customers imagine hermetic packages improve reliability,
>
> And, don't they...for some environments?

Maybe if you're operating your circuits in high pressure steam. But  
in space? Nope. There's a widespread fervent *faith* that hermetic  
packages are more reliable, but actual experience with operation of  
electronics in space tell a different tale.

>
> /~\ The ASCII				der Mouse
> \ / Ribbon Campaign
>  X  Against HTML	       mouse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> / \ Email!	     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geda-dev mailing list
> geda-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev

John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd@xxxxxxxxx




_______________________________________________
geda-dev mailing list
geda-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev