gEDA: Re: Generate and SmartModels

[Stephen Williams <steve@xxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Larry Doolittle wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 05:02:39PM -0600, John McCaskill wrote:
>>> generate ... Generate ... GENERATE !!!!
>> Is this good or bad excitement?
> 
> Good excitement.  I want it, and I'm happy when others say
> they do too.  Right now the only bounty I can offer is a
> round of drinks at SV-OSEDA.  I can't imagine the red tape
> I would have to jump through to get my lab to offer a bounty.
> Not to mention the red tape Steve would have to jump through
> to collect it.

I'll tell you what. If there were a significant bounty for it,
then my wife might be much more keen on giving up on me for a
while while I work on it;-) Otherwise, it's just a matter of
patience, because I do want to sneak it in, although when day
job has a model that doesn't run, that gets priority.

On the subject of smart models, that's just a case where I would
need professional help. For example, if there is someone out there
*writing* SmartModels who wanted to cooperate with me by writing
trivial test models that help us work out the interfaces, then
all the verilog portions would be easy.
- --
Steve Williams                "The woods are lovely, dark and deep.
steve at icarus.com           But I have promises to keep,
http://www.icarus.com         and lines to code before I sleep,
http://www.picturel.com       And lines to code before I sleep."
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFD4/MxrPt1Sc2b3ikRAiN3AKDqI89P6sy886PC7vFNj3G1KNmFYgCgq4uV
ug351h8P5NDhalmnSSYDLFQ=
=sa0U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----