[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
[freehaven-cvs] slight reorg
Update of /home/freehaven/cvsroot/doc/routing-zones
In directory moria.mit.edu:/tmp/cvs-serv14453
Modified Files:
routing-zones.tex
Log Message:
slight reorg
Index: routing-zones.tex
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/freehaven/cvsroot/doc/routing-zones/routing-zones.tex,v
retrieving revision 1.22
retrieving revision 1.23
diff -u -d -r1.22 -r1.23
--- routing-zones.tex 27 Jan 2004 17:48:33 -0000 1.22
+++ routing-zones.tex 27 Jan 2004 17:56:36 -0000 1.23
@@ -769,31 +769,42 @@
+
+\section{Design Recommendations}
+
+In light of our analysis, which has shown that certain ASes have
+considerable easvesdropping capabilities on mix networks, we propose two
+recommendations with regard to mix network design. First, mix networks
+should select paths with the underlying AS-level topology in mind.
+Second, mix networks should strive to deploy more nodes in locations
+with a large number of AS-level exit points.
+
+\subsection{Explicit Consideration of AS-level Paths}
+
\subsection{Improving Jurisdictional Independence with Node Placement}
- B. How do these results change as we change our assumptions
- about the set of nodes from which you can select:
-
- - If you have 10 nodes in the US, where is the best place to
- have them?
- hypothesis: there are about 10 "tier-1 ISPs". maybe one
- in each of those probably gives you sufficient set of
- choices, without giving too much info away based on your
- choices from the 10.
+where would you add nodes, if you had the choice? talk about internap.
- an alternative approach would picking 10 very far-flung
- edge ISPs who have different upstreams, etc. this may
- work better, actually, though you do run the risk of
- having each pairwise path go through 1 or 2 of the same
- ISPs if you are not careful.
- - How much do transatlantic nodes help, etc? i.e., Would you
- do anything differently if you had this option?
+%% B. How do these results change as we change our assumptions
+%% about the set of nodes from which you can select:
+
+%% - If you have 10 nodes in the US, where is the best place to
+%% have them?
-\section{Design Recommendations}
+%% hypothesis: there are about 10 "tier-1 ISPs". maybe one
+%% in each of those probably gives you sufficient set of
+%% choices, without giving too much info away based on your
+%% choices from the 10.
- Given our observations, what design recommendations can we make
- for systems like Tor re: node selection?
+%% an alternative approach would picking 10 very far-flung
+%% edge ISPs who have different upstreams, etc. this may
+%% work better, actually, though you do run the risk of
+%% having each pairwise path go through 1 or 2 of the same
+%% ISPs if you are not careful.
+
+%% - How much do transatlantic nodes help, etc? i.e., Would you
+%% do anything differently if you had this option?
\section{Conclusion}
@@ -809,7 +820,6 @@
well).
%temporary spacer while we don't have a conclusion to make sure things
% don't look ridiculous, aesthetically
-\vspace{6in}
%\section*{Acknowledgements}
***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@seul.org with
unsubscribe freehaven-cvs in the body. http://freehaven.net/