[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
[freehaven-cvs] correct related work, commit a new pdf
Update of /home/freehaven/cvsroot/doc/e2e-traffic
In directory moria.mit.edu:/home2/arma/work/freehaven/doc/e2e-traffic
Modified Files:
e2e-traffic.pdf e2e-traffic.tex
Log Message:
correct related work, commit a new pdf
Index: e2e-traffic.pdf
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/freehaven/cvsroot/doc/e2e-traffic/e2e-traffic.pdf,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -d -r1.1 -r1.2
Binary files /tmp/cvs2cev2b and /tmp/cvsgtRjhg differ
Index: e2e-traffic.tex
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/freehaven/cvsroot/doc/e2e-traffic/e2e-traffic.tex,v
retrieving revision 1.34
retrieving revision 1.35
diff -u -d -r1.34 -r1.35
--- e2e-traffic.tex 25 Jan 2004 17:07:25 -0000 1.34
+++ e2e-traffic.tex 26 Jan 2004 02:42:16 -0000 1.35
@@ -174,9 +174,9 @@
recipient by wrapping messages in layers of public-key cryptography, and
relaying them through a path composed of \emph{mixes}. Each mix in turn
decrypts, delays, and re-orders messages, before relaying them toward their
-destinations. Chaum proved the security of a mix against a \emph{passive
- adversary} who eavesdrops on all communications but is unable to observe
-the reordering inside the mix.
+destinations. % Chaum proved the security of a mix against a \emph{passive
+% adversary} who eavesdrops on all communications but is unable to observe
+%the reordering inside the mix.
% This above statement is misleading, no? The proof only holds when
% Alice sends always/only once, IIRC. -NM
Because some mixes might be controlled by an
***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@seul.org with
unsubscribe freehaven-cvs in the body. http://freehaven.net/